- Sandra: Sometimes, Cloud, a boy just isn’t aware of how much he’s hurting his girlfriend with his behavior.
- Sandra: It’s true that time heals many wounds. But there are things that even the most easy-going girl will never forgive!
- Cloud: Whatever. $2000, please.
- Sandra: It’s over between us, Cloud! Over!
|
@ Anonymous:
Monopoly watching; Good. Good. Everything is going according to plan. One more relationship destroyed. BWAHAHAHAAHHA
Dang cloud look what you become it all about the money now isnt it.
This had made me REALLY want to play some Monopoly now. Love it 😀
Izumi Ryu wrote:
Actually, I think that Cloud made the right choice. If he yields to Sandra’s whims in a situation like this, he may temporarily make her happier. However, in the long run he would just make himself look like a doormat and most girls are not attracted too doormats.
Monopoly stopped being fun a long time ago.
Onihikage wrote:
According to a TV-Show in Germany, which I watched years ago, the German Communist Party published around 1925 a “worker´s edition” of “Monopoly”. It was really a communistic propaganda game. You had to pay fines, if you forgot the birthday of Comrade Lenin!
😉 😉 😉
@ Panders:
She wouldn’t be able to handle the envy when Larisa is with him. She’ll find out she wasn’t lying. 🙂
Monopoly is very good when you have large amounts of time to waste, and lack the internet.
But you need to make sure you play it with people that don’t mind losing.
Kinda reminds me of a scene of Charlie Brown & the Peanuts in one of their movies…
playing monopoly on the floor. Wise. Saves the table from flipping
TehTimmah wrote:
That’s why you don’t invite Jesus to the game…^_-
Do not pass go and do not collect 200 dollars!! Lol.
I had a feeling that’d be the punchline.
That was great.
Ouch. Hotel on Boardwalk. Bad luck landing on that Sandy.
@ ve4gap:
Jesus would only flip the table if the game were being played in a temple. I think the living room floor would be okay, that is until someone starts throwing the little hat and shoe pieces.
Oh, the pain of landing on a fully invested Boardwalk. The funny thing is, that’s what I usually do; buy nothing but Park Place and Boardwalk and invest all my money into them, and then laugh as they get nailed with a hefty 1500 or 2000 dollar fine and get the “move to Park Place” cards. It’s hilarious to watch my enemies struggle in defeat.
@ Novil:
Y’know, I think you’re right. There are plenty of fish in the sea. An old friend of mine from way back in 5th grade is moving back into town, who knows what’ll happen with me and her. As for my ex, let’s just say that some buff guy who goes to the gym near our house says he’s got a new girl…yeah. Oh well. At least I have Pokemon, Sandra and Woo, and SSB4 news.
Oh, and bacon. I always got bacon.
and once again another good man turns into an evil part of the system.
Congrats Cloud, you’re mother would kill you if she saw you destroying lives this way.
illeatyourself wrote:
Yes.
You’re also the only one who kept finding the raccoons attractive.
.
It is creepy.
Very creepy.
Maybe I’m just boring, but this is something I would never joke about with my girlfriend.
In a Monopoly ripoff I made, you get to set your own prices. Now it breaks friendships 300% quicker!
@ Sambo:
Short answer, if I understand it, is that she’s got an enormous number on her shirt. To say the least.
I think it’s calling the “TREE” function with Graham’s number as the argument. Graham’s number is horrifyingly enormous, and the “TREE” function grows even faster than the Ackermann function (which itself grows faster than any exponential).
If each particle in the universe had its own universe, and each particle in each of those universes had its own universe, Graham’s number would still dwarf the number of particles in all those universes. And I’m fairly sure I’m understating things. I’m not certain you would surpass Graham’s number if you took another layer of universes of particles for every second that has passed in this universe. Taking that number, and sticking it into the TREE function is just mind-breaking.
@ Anonymous:
In the immortal words of one Clancy Wiggum, “How do those Parker brothers sleep at night?”
@ Kaigakoi:
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Sorry. I had to.
My family played Monopoly with me once.
We never played it again.
In all seriousness, I drove my mom and my sister into deep debt with me, then suggested that they could pay me back with their properties. My father and I had been engaged in a subtle war throughout the entire game where we were being incredibly decisive about our purchases and were carefully watching each other, but it came to his detriment when I received my mother and sister’s properties and pulled far ahead, allowing me to win the game with ease; by that point, it was too late for them to do anything.
Apparently, when playing Monopoly, I look and act like a loan shark.