[0771] Wild(e) For Judy
└ posted on Thursday, 24 March 2016, by Novil
- Sid: You’ve really had enough, Ruth. Let’s go home.
- Ruth: Yes, Sid, let’s go to your place.
- Ruth: Don’t get me wrong. We’re purely platonic friends. Our interspecies relationship is therefore one-hundred percent Disney-compatible!
- Sid: Ya-ha, we’ll… play some good ol’ board games.
- Ruth: Sure we will! Sid’s really into role playing, you know.
- Sid: Haha, yeah, I sure love me some D&D… Now let’s go!
- Ruth: Do you want to play “Nick and Judy visit the nudist colony“ again?
- Sid: Ruth!
S&W in German/auf Deutsch
![[0771] Wild(e) For Judy](/comics/2016-03-24-0771-wilde-for-judy.png "[0771] Wild(e) For Judy")
There is something seriously wrong with that squirrel.
Wow I had no idea that was going on between them.
Though my opinion counts for nothing, I just wanted to say I approve of the last couple of comics. I shared the last one (“nsfk”) with my wife. Sandra and Woo is usually a PG place, so the occasional foray beyond is funny and welcome.
Contra Menage-a-3, where it has become trite and boring.
Oliver
If you only saw Zootopia a day or two ago, when did you finalize the dialog?
Was this strip originally planned to have a different joke?
I agree with Woo scratching his head in the last panel. Ruth’s statement IS confusing, except for her bandana, they are already naked.
@ Thisguy:
Also, what exactly did Richard season that steak with?
The shipping is strong with this one.
And his name is Novil 😉
Wow, that steak made her super drunk.
Edda wrote:
This strip was already planned like this. But I wrote three additional strips that will be published in the next weeks.
Thisguy wrote:
First they dress up as Nick and Judy, of course.
Thisguy wrote:
Jack Daniel marinade.
Methinks Sid doth Protest too much…
@ Edda:
That part was in a bunch of trailers.
Heh, it’s not like Sid has any chance of meeting a female of his species in America.
Unless he breaks into a zoo or something.
I could swear someone shipped these two a while back and Novil said it was not gonna happen.
How does she even know what Zootopia is?
LOL, I haven’t watched Zootopia and I have no intention to, but the strip is still funny. Like I mentioned earlier, Ruth’s drunkenness is very understandable, akin to getting high on something after abstaining from your favorite food for so long. Like I mention, you go on diet for a very long time and suddenly you binge on ice cream (or in Ruth’s case, prime steak), your body and brain will go into euphoric overdrive. Made more hilarious due to the sexual overtones Ruth is making.
I love you so much for that Zootopia reference right now!
Of course, since she’s the carnivore, Ruth plays Nick and Sid is Judy? ^_~
@ Thisguy:
Alcoholic marinades would normally evaporate off during cooking, leaving the flavor and only a bit of alcohol behind. However, Ruth ate the steak raw, and on top of that, it was bigger than she is, so she consumed far more alcohol than expected.
@ Andy Wong:
>I haven’t watched Zootopia and I have no intention to
Really? Seems kinda odd for someone who reads anthro comics. Besides, you’d missing out on a wonderful movie.
@ mortar:
There’s a stigma around it because furries like it so much. Just sayin.
@ mortar:
But i’m sure it’s a great movie. It IS disney pixar after all.
@ John Willow:that’s like asking where she got her gun from.
@ Charbelbou:
Don’t know why there would be a stigma, half of Disney’s movies have talking animals bordering on Anthropomorphism anyway.
@ mortar:
Nothing against Pixar, Disney and talking animals. I just got weird vibes from the movie after seeing a trailer with a deer in a pink bra.
Sadly, there’s no theater near me offering a single subtitled copy of Zootopia. I saw the dubbed clip and they slayed the sloth camel joke. I will have to wait for it hit the closed TV.
Fortunatelly, I have some good replacements. Like Sandra and Woo. This arc’s hillarious, from the Raccoon Goddess vacation to Ruth meat antics. Keep um the great work
For those who keep crediting Pixar, please stop. Zootopia was created by Disney Animation, not their Pixar division.
@ Andy Wong:
If that’s the only thing stopping you from seeing it, I highly encourage you not to let it stop you any more. Zootopia is easily one of the best movies to come out this year, and definitely the most enjoyable movie I’ve seen in a long time.
I’m actully wondering about Richard. Are his steaks marinated?
Ah, Zootopia. An excellent watch.
Andy Wong wrote:
Weird. I didn’t see that one. But I can promise you the movie isn’t like that at all. There isn’t any sexuality whatsoever, express or implied. It’s a family movie, and a tame one at that. The whole thing is mostly just an extended metaphor for racism, combined with a kind of “whodunit” mystery and a lot of silly humor. That’s really all. The association with furries is a result of the marketing company they hired, not anything in the film itself.
Charbelbou wrote:
That’s, at best, a guarantee of Mediocrity.
@ Xezlec:
Very well, I will give Zootopia a shot since most of you insist it is 100% heartwarming, and won’t make my anti-furry meter go haywire. I know I’m being a hypocrite considering I paint and play Space Wolves in Warhammer 40K, but I really don’t like seeing animals sexual innuendo humans/humanoids.
I’m also kinda cynical towards Disney and Pixar lately, except for Frozen and Brave. I haven’t seen Inside Out though which I heard is also very deep. The Good Dinosaur on the other hand, just screamed WRONG to me.
But that’s just my opinion. Just being a cynical bastard who misses the old Disney renaisance from Little Mermaid to Tarzan.
@ Andy Wong:
Inside Out is very much worth seeing. Clever premise, good writing, great voice acting, and some innovative cgi effects (although those are subtle and support the story, rather than overwhelming it).
@ Andy Wong:
The Good Dinosaur was an excellent film. The worst that can be said about it is that the plot is derivative – kind of an 80’s coming of age, “Boy and his Dog” flick, except the boy is a dinosaur and the dog is a surprisingly agile cave-toddler.
If it’s the “dinosaurs living with cavemen” thing, don’t worry too hard; they explain that the story is unequivocally unreal _in the intro_ – this is a “what if” movie, not a creationist one.
A Boy and His Dog the 1975 film based on Harlan Ellison’s story by the same title.
Excellent movie but not for the Squeamish.
When it comes to dogs, I squeam. Don’t hurt the puppy!
athroughzdude wrote:
You mean … aside from her purely canivoric diet?
Kits!
Darkrai444 wrote:
Impossible.
@ Novil:
Yeah, they’re not even the same genus.
They could adopt…
EvilMidnightLurker wrote:
Yes, they totally should adopt… wolf puppies!
@ Novil:
Why? Aren’t they both squirrels?
@ Thisguy:
LOL nothing shes just meat drunk, Ive seen it happen to squirrells here when they raid the bird suet
@ Novil:
Inconceivable!
But…but….you guys are already naked! What’s the point?! Wait, would two different squirrel species…erm, coupling…..produce offspring? I’d have to presume so, considering evidence that creatures of the same family can reproduce (Ligers, dogs generally, etc.)