- Larisa: I’m sure you’ve heard some of these nasty rumors going ’round ’bout me. But I’m not like that!
- Larisa: I mean, it’s not like I’ve ever committed a felony!
- Larisa: …
- Larisa: Well, apart from that insignificant attempt to cause an unauthorized nuclear detonation last July.
- Landon: So that was the reason for that squad of black helicopters.
|
Rule of cool, I guess. Otherwise, I’d think it was a little out of character for Larissa to do that.
Unless, you know, tragedy. As in, she’s living life to the fullest, because it’s sort of shorter for her than for other people… I think I might have done the same in that case.
Landon is now my favorite character.
“I don’t THINK I’ve ever committed a FELONY… it’s complicated; they keep changing the classifications of crimes these days.”
@ Tucci78:
Obama cheating his way into office? Are you serious? Obama may not be the best president, but all this desperation to paint him as the antichrist is just downright ridiculous.
I really hope you’re not one of those fools who will blame everything Bush did on Obama then worship Bush in the same breath and pretend he was one of the best presidents in modern history.
At least cite your claims. …and no, right-wing conspiracist websites don’t count.
I messed around a bit and now she’s all alone and shrugging…
Didn’t think it was possible for a person to bat a -100. But somehow Larisa did it.
You know you’ve created a fun character if someone has to think after saying “I mean, it’s not like I’ve ever committed a felony!”
Time to test this avatar thingy
Broken Arrow: The pyromaniac’s ultimate score.
How on earth is she not is jail yet??
@ FallenLove123:
Um, no they’re not. The wiseacre in me wants to say that only an American teacher would have had a reaction like that to insulin, but really, read Sid’s origin story (starting at 231) and Woo’s exposition on The Special One in 533.
Okay, now I’m really starting to hate Larisa…
And sorry to go off-topic, but do you guys have any new info to the Sandra and Woo adventure game? It’s been almost two years now.
And, once again, I’m really starting to hate Larisa.
@ Anonymous:
Yeah, sorry. It’s just that she’s going over the edge here. It’s actually kind of funny in a sense.
She´s honest if nothing else… I´ll give her that.
Adamas wrote:
Aw, how “Liberal” a sentiment. By definition, head-wedged and Nurmee-nurmee-nurmee-I-can’t-hear-you! thought-blocking.
You’re not interested in “POLITICS!!!!!” are ya? Too goddam bad.
As if that will get the frikken’ politicians to keep their hands off your own personal life, liberties, and property.
It’s Tuesday now. You ready to yank that rostral knob of yours out’n yer tochus and see the light?
Dee wrote:
Tsk. Are you – like most “Liberal” fascist partisans – mistaking every critic of our frabjous faux noir phoney of a Cook County Machine corruptocrat for a Republican, or even any kind of apologist for the Shrub and the malignant misrule perpetrated in his administrations?
What the hell is it with you leftards, anyway? What we suffer under in this republic of ours since the elections of 1896 has been the illusion of a “two-party system” which has been nothing more than a single permanent incumbency made up of nominal factions whereby a single cadre of grafting, ever-more-authoritarian thugs maintain a bedraggled illusion of choice.
Which you’ve apparently bought, haven’tcha?
The presidential elections of 2012 were dog-wagged in so many ways to prevent Soebarkah’s removal from the Oval Office that only someone with his eyes firmly fixed on his own rectal mucosa could sustain your sort of psychoneurotic denial of the realities thereof, up to and including the Red Faction establishment’s obliteration of all debate over the manifold hideous realities of that Indonesian citizen’s economically disastrous dirigiste sabotage of the domestic economy (because, of course, the Republicans’ owners wanted all that bankster bowbery perpetrated, too).
Or have you been comatose through the past half-a-decade? I don’t expect any “Liberal” to express any understanding of political economics (after all, willful ignorance is the defining quality of any Alinsky-besotted “Liberal”), but the least trace of dignity and decency might possibly give you to avoid trying to push that reeking “Blame Bush!” horsepuckey as if it excused the manifold malfeasances of Michelle’s Metrosexual Meatpuppet and the rest of the National Socialist Democrat American Party.
It’s not even a joke anymore, you pitiful jerk.
Now she will have to deal with economic sanctions and UN resolutions condemning her nuclear program.
@ Tucci78:
How does this have anything to a wonderfully funny comic or an awesome character like Larissa?
Paeris Kiran wrote:
Plutonium? Nah, all you need is some enriched uranium. And for that, well, I’m guessing you haven’t read The Radioactive Boy Scout: The True Story of a Boy and His Backyard Nuclear Reactor. See, first you build a nuclear breeder reactor in your garden shed…
Valkeiper2012 wrote:
And now she needs to remember the first rule when one finds one’s self in a hole: *STOP DIGGING!!!*
@ Tucci78:
Take a chill pill dude.
reynard61 wrote:
Well in Larisa’s case the only thing she can do is DIG DEEPER. Into the pit. Unless fire gets involved.
Edward really likes Larisa. He’s been smiling this whole time. I’m sure we can comfort that he approves of Larisa. I mean who dosent?
@ Tucci78:
Orson Wells said it best- “When fascism comes to America, it will be draped in thew American flag and carrying the cross. I dunno too many “liberals” who fit that bill, but I do know of 50+ “conservatives” that do. Honestly, I am more a libertarian, and can see the good and the bad in both sides. You choose to close your mind off to one side and look away from the bad stuff that your side is guilty of as well. It is really sad that you want others to “see the light,” when the light is what can truly blind a person.
@ Zog:
plutonium is easier to separate into sufficiently clean state… contrary to uranium you can do it chemicaly.
My question here is why the heck are we discussing politics in a place where people are reading about little kids, that are tweens, or are they teens at this point, I haven’t been keeping up with age if someone wants to fill me in, and talking raccoons? If you want to make a difference, learn your audience you are trying to get at, and discuss it at a place your audience will actually be at and care to listen at, both very important parts of creating an actual heard message, and not just annoying words on a screen.
Ok, website owner, be honest. These polls you have. The last one I saw was about relationship status. Do tell, who are you selling this demographic info to? :/
Paeris Kiran wrote:
I could pretend I knew that, but I didn’t. You learn something new every day, etc.
However, whereas plutonium is probably beyond the reach of private individuals of modest means, a kid only a very few years older than Larisa actually did completely on his own build a thorium-fueled thermal breeder reactor, ignoring the most basic of safety precautions and creating what later became a federal Superfund site in the process. He never extracted fissile uranium from the waste, but to be fair to him that wasn’t his goal, and theoretically he could have done that.
I’m more of the opinion that dad may be thinking his leg is getting pulled and is quite amused actually. But also knows just how uptight his wife is and does not dare laugh out loud.
Don’t feed the troll, guys. Anyone using those types of expressions is either that or a blind fool. Both are not worth arguing with.
Tucci78 wrote:
If I wanted to talk about politics I’d be on Fox or MSNBC or CNN. But this is a COMIC. Something one reads for ENJOYMENT not to have someone of ANY AFFILIATION (And I’ll tell a Dem to blow it out their a$$ just as fast as a Rep I’ve been listening to both sides doing nothing but throwing feces at each other for 14 years. If you cannot speak intelligently DO NOT SPEAK!!!
“It’s not like I’ve ever committed a FELONY!” — Oh, but you have committed misdemeanors? How many? Those are still crimes, ya know.
“Well, apart from that ONE felony…” — Yeah, that’s not really going to reassure the nervous parents.
@ Zerozon:
Not just that. I stand by what I said yesterday: considering his INCREDIBLY LARGE GRIN in the first panel there, he is legitimately INTRIGUED by Larisa. All in favor of guessing that he is going to approve the relationship…
@ MawileCeyvis:
When has Larisa given us even the slightest hint that she is a Stalinist?
Also, panel 4? Black helicopters? I think she’s pulling their chain. Actually that’s not a bad idea. Keep getting worse and worse until they know you must be joking, and you can convince them you’ve been putting it on since the start.
Whether this is true or not I don’t know, but I’m sure our girl Larisa is smart enough to think of it.