|
Currently on hiatus :-(
 S&W in German/auf DeutschGaia (my fantasy comic) Scarlet (my science fantasy comic) |
|
| Sandra and Woo is supported by our patron r4m0n. Thank you very much! |
|
![[0713] Group Of Recipients](/comics/2015-08-27-0713-group-of-recipients.png "[0713] Group Of Recipients")
I have posted the submissions that reached a place between position 11 and 25 of this year’s artwork contest.
- Sandra: You accidentally sent a nude photo of yourself to several people?!
- Larisa: Yup.
- Sandra: To how many people?
- Larisa: Well, yesterday I installed this new, unofficial add-on…
- Larisa: … and apparently I misconfigured it, or it had a bug, or something.
- Sandra: This means you sent it to all your contacts?!
- Larisa: All SnapPic users in North America.
|
Sandra and Woo by Oliver Knörzer is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. See the About page for details.
Privacy Policy | Impressum | © 2008 – 2025 Oliver Knörzer
She is a minor.
She is going to get a lot of flack for this.
Oh boy… Bet her mom is going to have something to say about that…
One of my friends liked to brag that, at Her High School it wasn’t Nude Photos people talked about.
It was her classmates who just went ahead and had Sex right there in the Classroom while the teacher was down the hall.
She said there was an “I Double Dog Dare You” involved…
.
Pretty sure she is going to get into some serious legal trouble. Prison & be a registered sex offender now. Zero tolerance law
@ Anonymous Person:
That’s the logical fallacy of False Analogy (or more correctly, Insufficiently Similar Analogy).
Violence can be objectively determined. So can whether or not any particular food is likely to cause harm because of intentional or unintentional contamination.
“Pornography” cannot be objectively determined by any known means. “Pornography” is totally subjective. All “standards” established to supposedly determine what is and is not pornographic by an “objective standard” rely totally on subjectiveness and any illusion of objectivity is, and must necessarily be, false.
You’re comparing objective to subjective, thus your argument doesn’t fly.
Whether or not the original statement you were trying to argue against is correct, is another matter, but your attempt at a rebuttal falls flat on its face.
@ OMGWTH:
My god, the wall of text… It’s unbelievable. Since there’s no way I can answer every point here’s a few random ones:
1. Given Larisa’s *history* one can reasonably assume she meant this for sensual effect.
2. I think you’re projecting yourself into Larisa in a way not true to the author’s intent.
3. “Sometimes there were even boys there, of course we kicked them out and of course they did whatever they could to sneak a peek.” Given what you said, why exactly did you kick them out? Why were they all trying to sneak a peak? I thought you said nudity in itself isn’t arousing, and if it is you must be insane.
4. Those examples can be done alone, so yeah, that’s not even an argument unless you’re homosexual, but still…)
@ Vercalos:
It’s already been said it was an unofficial add-on, so that explains some of it. Still darn near impossible without a huge Anonymous-like organization behind it, and even then, it would be made unusable within a week (the add-on, not the app).
@ DonJuan:
more like anyone who downloaded it and depending upon the state. regardless, a lot of people are gonna have to burn their phones which would be the best way to do so given whose in the photo.
@ Crystalgate:
There *is* something wrong with it. Not everyone wants to see nudes. It can feel violating. In person, they can refuse. But here, they’re just casually opening an app, and BAM! Nudes in their face.
Frapparition wrote:
Well…
I came across this right away after searching for cupid and church. I doubt those are the only people who would like your campaign idea.
@ Zann:
I do but that has NOTHING to do with my comments. I will, however, link you 1 strip to drive my point home about her, and another showing why i don’t care about flak from others
Strip 1
Strip 2
Pay close attention to the wisdom of strip 3 2nd bit
Well shít
Sandra is really strong.
Well things got escalated quickly, evidence provided by the squished can.
Effie Ray wrote:
Welcome to reality, kid, there are more people out there like that than you think. It’s not about nice it’s about real. Not everything in this world is about emotions.
@ OMGWTH:
What a wall of textual garbage. The biggest proponents of anti-pornography laws are far left feminists on the grounds that nudity in media is inherently sexist and contributes to the continued exploitation of women by the patriarchy.
Admittedly it’s a controversial subject and feminists are pretty well split on the issue of adult nudity in media, but feminists almost universally agree that any media depicting a minor in the nude should be considered pornography and censored with criminal charges to follow immediately.
Hard-core feminists are in reality far more puritanical than even the most conservative religious groups in that regard. They also are also the first to trot out “victim blame” if the “victim” fails to take the proper role of victim. (or if the “victimizer” happens to be a Democrat)
People have mocked me for not getting a cell phone like others have. But I refused to follow the sheeple and gullible masses. So who’s laughing now?! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
…She is so dead she technically did a MAJOR felony