[1319] Top Trumps
└ posted on Thursday, 3 March 2022, by Novil
- Caption: After all the boys have left…
- Larisa: Zoey, I believe you’re very badly informed.
- Zoey: About what?
- Larisa: Penises! And their many advantages!
- Zoey: You can’t be serious!
- Larisa: That’s why I brought a penis themed Top Trumps deck. Look! 52 of the world’s finest penises!
- Zoey: This is so pathetic I don’t even feel sexually harassed by your sexual harassment.
- Zoey: Eeep!
- Sandra: What’s up, Zoey?
- Zoey: I do kinda like that one…
- Larisa: One of us! One of us! One of us!
S&W in German/auf Deutsch
![[1319] Top Trumps](/comics/2022-03-03-1319-top-trumps.png "[1319] Top Trumps")
Eh… Not great, not terrible. I’d give it 3.6.
Funny, I thought Larisa was all in favor of lesbians. More penises for her!
@ Daniel Kelly:hm thing is… PRE puberty you can’t really be sure of the sex orientation. The chemical and hormonal changes due to puberty have a HUGE impact on those thing. Fundamentally saying a six years old is lesbian is completely meaningless and for a twelve years old is somewhat iffy. That said it is obviously important to not demean or dismiss the feeling of the child in question, just keeping in mind that they ARE child growing up and as such QUITE prone to change.
Byteflush wrote:
Out of… ?
AnotherFacade wrote:
It actually would’ve been funny to end it there, yes. With Zoey’s statement.
“Isn’t it awfully nice to have a penis? Isn’t it frightfully good to have a dong?” —not Noel Coward.
MarqFJA87 wrote:
The Kinsey Scale is inadequate and out of date because it fails to account for asexuals. A better system would have two scales; one which measures heterosexual attraction and one which measures homosexual attraction. This still isn’t perfect by a long shot, but at least you can measure asexuality with it (both scales near or at zero). I don’t believe that a “perfect” scale is possible when you’re dealing with the variability of human beings, but a two-scale system is a vast improvement over the Kinsey Scale.
Bahamuttone wrote:
While that’s an extremely popular notion (that children have to go through puberty before you can determine their sexual orientation), the reported experiences of non-orthosexual individuals contradicts that dogmatic viewpoint.
Many gay men have said that, in retrospect, they can now see that they had “gay leanings” as early as six or seven years of age. I know that I had feelings which directly relate to my orientation when I was still only 4-5 years of age, so the dogma that children “can’t know” is demonstrably not universal.
@ Melkior:
That is affected by selection bias.
OBVIOUSLY those who ARE gay as adult had that orientation also before puberty.
What is NOT true is that ALL those who were attracted to same sex persons would then BE attracted by same sex persons AFTER puberty.
Your own experience is just confirmation bias.
It’s not that they can’t know, it’s that statistically you can go either way.
There is an idea of having kids being able of taking life changing decisions and commitment lately that is quite crazy… they are kids… they LITERALLY have not a brain yet fully developed.
It’s not as if a lesbian wouldn’t have a use for a penis shaped object. It’s just they don’t want the guy it’s attached to.
Antiyonder wrote:
Oh, absolutely! I agree 100%.
62 comments, Gosh damn. Bravo Novil, your trolling skills are out the roof. 👏
Grammar lesson. The plural of “penis” is “penes”.
Context is important these are school mates and I’m fairly positive that Larisa is not seriously trying to convert anyone and is just being stupid and having fun. Also she strikes as the type of person who was just looking for any excuse to pull that deck out, reminds me of someone I went to school with.
I just want to mention that this might just be a hint that she’s Bi not Lesbian. Because I mean we did have about a year or 2 ago a strip where Zoey was openly attracted to a guy, that she knew was a guy. And this was well after she came out as lesbian. Now I don’t read every new strip, so maybe i missed one after that where she went back on that, but her liking at least one picture in this strip isn’t surprising with that context in mind. I mean i’m not saying she isn’t meant to be lesbian, and that this might just be a joke made in poor taste. I’m just saying this being a hint to her being Bi is a slightly realistic theory.
Where did she get the cards? Online, of course. Yep, this is accurate. I was a cub scout and girl scout leader for ten years. All the kids talked about sex when they thought no one was around. Also, when my daughter was in 5th grade, the topics on the playground were quite graphic. And this was many years ago! With the internet, kids now can know everything.
I am not a Yurpeen. What is top trumps?
So Many PUNS!
Solitare
52 pickup
‘Holding a good mittful’
Old Maid
Poke(he)r
Go Fish
Everything just gets hilariously Dirty. Well Done!
Siah wrote:
I don’t think so. Do you mean the story arc started on [0511] A Visitor From England?
Max wrote:
It’s an old (late 1970s) cards game based on a specific theme, like sports cars, trains, movies, dinosaurs… and apparently penises.
Take a look at https://toptrumps.com/
@ Nikary Flare:
its probably standard equipment for a succubus 😉
I wonder if Larissa has shifted Zoey’s Kinsey score a little lower than 6?
Only 52 cards? A proper deck of naughty cards would have included two Jokers.
I can see how this will turn out…
Loudspeaker: “Larisa Korolev and Sandra North report to the counselor’s office.”
Sandra: “Aw, man!”
Zoey: “Seems your pathetic attempt at sexual harassment was enough to catch the counselor’s attention. I wonder how they knew so quickly… Anyways, it serves you right!”
Loudspeaker: “You too, Zoey Irwin. All three of you please report to the counselor’s office.”
*Zoey slumps in defeat. As they leave the room, the boys look on the three girls with unamused expressions. Yes, the boys heard everything.*
@ Cromm:
No I’m referring to 1091 Zoey’s Got The Solution.
Melkior wrote:
I used to work in a Tim Horten’s where a bunch of them adopted the phrase “suck my D@@K!” and challenged each other to say it louder than the one before them. They were in the back, but we had customers in the front, and they were pretty audible.
They got scolded, but none of them got fired or even formally reprimanded. Two months later, I got fired because I forgot which items on the menu were free to employees and which not.
Ah… “gender equality”…Melkior wrote:
Very true. I worked at a Tim Hortens where a bunch of them were showing each other their underwear, and challenging each other to say “Suck my D!@k” louder than the previous. Customers out front could hear them. They got scolded, but none fired or even formally reprimanded on paper.
Two months later, I got fired because I forgot which specific items on the menu were free to employees and which not.
Ah, “gender equality”…