Yes, but I have observed that people like fantasy a bit more than science fiction. Usually, combinations like Shadowrun (Magic + Technology), FF (Magic + Nature + Tech) or Star Wars (Force = Magic) work well. A pure science fiction tends to appeal to a smaller audience, although there are counter examples like Star Trek.
Yes, but I have observed that people like fantasy a bit more than science fiction. Usually, combinations like Shadowrun (Magic + Technology), FF (Magic + Nature + Tech) or Star Wars (Force = Magic) work well. A pure science fiction tends to appeal to a smaller audience, although there are counter examples like Star Trek.
Like Gaia, Scarlet will be more fantasy than science fiction.
Yes, but I have observed that people like fantasy a bit more than science fiction. Usually, combinations like Shadowrun (Magic + Technology), FF (Magic + Nature + Tech) or Star Wars (Force = Magic) work well. A pure science fiction tends to appeal to a smaller audience, although there are counter examples like Star Trek.
Like Gaia, Scarlet will be more fantasy than science fiction.
although there are counter examples like Star Trek.
One letter: Q.
Star Trek has more science than Star Wars, but still plenty of magic. Like, sure, Clarke’s third law, but it’s SHOWN as magic because there is no attempt to explain it.
Yes, but I have observed that people like fantasy a bit more than science fiction. Usually, combinations like Shadowrun (Magic + Technology), FF (Magic + Nature + Tech) or Star Wars (Force = Magic) work well. A pure science fiction tends to appeal to a smaller audience, although there are counter examples like Star Trek.
Arent wrote:
Like Gaia, Scarlet will be more fantasy than science fiction.
Novil wrote:
Ah, that’s great ^^ One of my favorite pages:
http://www.sandraandwoo.com/gaia/2014/06/20/the-letter-of-jael-bara-062/
Arent wrote:
One letter: Q.
Star Trek has more science than Star Wars, but still plenty of magic. Like, sure, Clarke’s third law, but it’s SHOWN as magic because there is no attempt to explain it.
Arent wrote:
Agree.
Yes, that page turned out great.