- Woo: Dear See-o-ahtlah-ma-kas-kay, if I don’t do something extremely funny today, I’ll be replaced by a talking piece of toast!
- Woo: I’m not sure if that’s funny enough.
|
|
Currently on hiatus :-(
 S&W in German/auf DeutschGaia (my fantasy comic) Scarlet (my science fantasy comic) |
|
| Sandra and Woo is supported by our patron h4v0kh3l1. Thank you very much! |
|
![[0344] The Contender II](/comics/2012-01-23-0344-the-contender-ii.png "[0344] The Contender II")
[0344] The Contender II
└ posted on Monday, 23 January 2012, by Novil
Click here to see the comments!
Sandra and Woo by Oliver Knörzer is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. See the About page for details.
Privacy Policy | Impressum | © 2008 – 2025 Oliver Knörzer
@ ViralBiae:
Uh-oh! Now my world policing U.S. Gov’t is going to arrest you and shut down S&W for using Heywood Banks’ lyrics without proper consent!
it doesn’t work when you intentionally try to be funny. So no, YOU FAILED tehe
I rather eat toast than read a comic about it. Don’t replace Woo!
Presumably if he doesn’t want to be replaced by a talking, he should just eat it? (Then again, the opportunity to see Woo in a skirt must never be missed!)
Tarbos wrote:
In “The Number of the Beast” Robert A Heinlein opined that all authors are gods, creating alternate universes and manipulating them as they wish. In one scene he actually erased a character in front of the other characters, who watched knowing what was happening. I always thought that was rather egotistical of him.
But he got his payback in “The Cat who walks through walls.” At the end of the book the hero is dieing, and he is pretty sure that his wife and the titular cat is dead. So the hero spends half a page cursing the author for killing the cat!
I think a psychologist would have a field day with that one… 🙂
@ Mike:
Heinlein was getting pretty far off the wall near the end. 😉
@ amadeusmop: It worked for Tom & Jerry…
@ alurker:
I was confused as well (I figured it was an email address or something, filtered through his POV… so co@lamaskay?), but then I googled it. To shorten Bobisonlybob’s description, it’s the phonetic transcription of “cioatlamacasque”, a female native american raccoon spirit.
So, “oh god” or “oh jeez” would be an easy analogy.
Hmm I wasn’t sure about this, but then I saw the big squeaky shoes and cracked a slight goofy grin and a “heh…” escaped my lips.
So, it is at least *technically* funny 😉
He’s basically tried to do a bit of Warner Bros slapstick, but it doesn’t really work as a comic rather than an animation, and he’s not quite subject to the same degree of cartoon physics as the WB guys. He’ll be in pain for a while, will have trouble cleaning the pie out of his fur, and will probably be in a lot of trouble…
To be honest, I just missed old Sandra and Woo, you know?
Pop fiction references can be funny but if they stray too much from what origionally drew people in and overshadow the main cast it’s just…you know? :/
Good job woo!
hmm…
mousetrap, checked
pie joke, checked
wrong dress, checked
imitating chaplin with big shoes, checked
and none of them were seems funny
@ amadeusmop:
They are funny when the happen to someone else.
@ Draccoon:
OH! That one hurt a bit…
Come on, Woo, think. What did you do to Tweety? Just repeat the pattern.
It feels like the time to say our goodbyes are just a strip away.
Eat the toast, Woo!
@ Frank:
Say what? I’m sorry, but if you truly believe that, you’re pretty naive.
@ Ry Rodrigo:
I dunno, I feel like the last ark and this one are influenced by what the author/artist feels the audience/viewers are saying about this comic… “This comic isn’t hard enough, This comic isn’t funny enough.” I honestly wouldn’t be surprised to see the next arc have a wall of text because “It’s not focusing on the story enough!”
>_<;; Take a comic as it is, something to help you break the normal repititions of your life, and enjoy the moment for what it is.
To be honest, the cookie wasn’t perfect when it was half baked. I suppose once it finally went stale the only remaining options were smash and burn…and from the ashes something exciting is forthcoming. Now, if only we could get rid of the rebellious streak and replace it with less manageable and more impressive than hedgemonic gobbledygook.
Finally, a comment that says what I also believe about this strip–and people are so impatient about story arcs that they don’t know the end of yet. Relax, and have fun! Rwar wrote:
No that’s just random.
Iron Ed wrote:
That he was. As I read his last three books each time I turned a page I asked myself “Why am I still reading this?” I personally think those three books should be removed from consideration when tallying up his life’s work.
@ Draccoon:
You could even stay it’s comedic style is rather dry.
Aww Woo! You don’t have to get hurt to be funny! Shoot eat another certain bird again and I’d just die all over again with laughter.
oh boy woo is in store for a duck amuck/rabbit rampage? FUN FUN FUN
I found the last panel funnier than the comic after this. TOM, YOU HAVE FAILED US.
Dear who?
@ Iron Ed:
Considering that Heinlein was an associate of L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, it wouldn’t surprise me. Was he a meth head like Philip K. Dick as well?
It disturbed me as well. @ Ellert0: I know ‘that’ FEEL bro.
Anybody else thinking of, ‘Duck Amuck’?
@ ekimmak:
The Raccoon goddess. Harder to pronounce than to draw.