|
Currently on hiatus :-(
 S&W in German/auf DeutschGaia (my fantasy comic) Scarlet (my science fantasy comic) |
|
| Sandra and Woo is supported by our patron Medinoc. Thank you very much! |
|
![[0714] The Only Question That Matters](/comics/2015-08-31-0714-the-only-question-that-matters.png "[0714] The Only Question That Matters")
I have posted the winners of this year’s artwork contest!
- Sandra: You. Sent. A. Naked. Pic. Of. Yourself. To. 50. Million. People. In. The. United. States?
- Larisa: Don’t forget the 10 million in Canada and Mexico.
- Sandra: This is… I really don’t know what to say.
- Larisa: Do you think my parents will find out?
- Sandra: I’d assume so.
- Larisa: Rats.
|
Sandra and Woo by Oliver Knörzer is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. See the About page for details.
Privacy Policy | Impressum | © 2008 – 2025 Oliver Knörzer
“50 million people in the US will see it!”
“Whatever.”
“And 10 million in Canada and Mexico!”
“Whatever.”
“And your parents!”
“Oh rats!”
60 million seeing Larisa naked? So what.
All of her classmates? She might enjoy it, kinky girl. Certainly not the end of the world.
Her parent or her boyfriend’s parents finding out? End of the world as she knows it.
Aww… I didn’t get one. 🙁
And next day… nothing happened because everyone decided that it would be better to delete this message and never ever even talk about it to anyone else;)
Considering that she’s a minor, it would be a felon for anyone to save that pic, so I suspect it won’t spread as badly as it could.
PeterH wrote:
To be fair, the problem isn’t how many who see her naked, the problem is the consequences.
Larisa can alter reality and deny physics. Looks like she needs to dive into the internet, fight the Snappic code, and siphon her photo back from every device that has it. Epic matrix quest time.
Actually the provider would be all over that picture like a cheap suit.
1. Spam – it would definitely trigger spam detectors (a message from a single user that goes to EVERYONE? Pretty much the definition of spam). As such they might very well have blocked it before it went anywhere – thus only the provider would know, and would at least suspender her account. But even failing blocking it outright, at least the provider would be aware of the picture and it going to everyone.
2. Child pornography – it would quickly become apparent that the picture was of an underage girl, and they would NOT want that particular label attached to them.
With both of those facts in place, the provider would very quickly act to delete the picture from their service (it’s not as hard as it sounds, databases are actually quite good at finding and manipulating things like that).
That isn’t to say no one would see it – assuming it wasn’t blocked outright – or save it to their own local storage (or that the picture would make the rounds of the kiddie porn sites), but the provider would probably get it long before it got around to that many people seeing it.
And that isn’t to say a complete shit storm won’t still result, because it will.
Eric wrote:
You realise that you’ve just sent a message to goes to EVERYONE? and I’m about to.
The NNTP protocol is designed to send messages to everyone in the world who wants to receive them. (Yes, spammers have noticed this) Snap Pic may use a similar system.
Don’t bet on the “Everyone will see her age” argument.
I knew a woman a while back who looked 12 until she was actually 25.
Very Late Bloomer.
Another woman I knew used to describe herself as:
“If I turn Sideways and stick out my Tongue, I look like a Zipper.”
She was 30 years old and had a 10 year old kid.
Weighed 85 pounds soaking wet.
Used to get a Kick out of going to the beach Topless and nobody really noticing.
.
LupisLight wrote:
THAT’S what I was thinking.
@ Jerry:
Nobody noticed she was topless (thought she was a ‘he’) or nobody noticed she was at the beach?
Imagine the interrogation Cloud will be getting if the pic makes it to his cellphone, Ye Thuza probably has his cell monitored. Or worse, his sister spots the pic, blackmail for life.
She’s taking this surprisingly well…
Well it can’t get any worse never mind Landon also could acdently do it as well
@ Xem42:
Ye Thuza doesn’t seem like the kind of mother who monitors her children closely.
Valkeiper2012 wrote:
She was she both small enough and flat enough to be mistaken for an underage girl who still young enough to go topless without comment.
@ Carefreewill:
Larisa isn’t a normal person. I don’t think she really cares about people seeing her body. The title was accurate, the question she asked was the only one that mattered to her.
@ Roguebfl:
If she looks like an underage girl it shouldn’t matter whether or not she goes topless anyway, regardless of actual age. Of course, the whole topless thing never made much sense in the first place, so I can imagine that it indeed would matter to a lot of people.
I’m just scared.
Birthday suits are scary.
And Phone add-ons.
Kuro_ wrote:
Or, is Snappic on the Cloud? 🙂
FloppyNotFound wrote:
@ Imperator Maximajorian:
Pretty sure, none. On the other hand the sender (shortly followed by sender’s parent) is quite likely to be investigated for distribution of child pornography.
@ Paul:
Depends a lot on the jurisdiction. Idk for the US, but in Germany Larissa would be too young to be punished for anything she did, but old enough that her parents don’t have to monitor her 24/7. So no problem there.
The receivers, OTOH, would be royally screwed. You are not allowed to possess child porn, period. No matter how you got it. Not even drawings or text-only stories. Yup, the law is that stupid. Wiping your phone, never saying a word and hoping nobody can (or will bother to) prove you got the pic might be your best bet in that case.
Don’t ever jump the optical axis!
You can’t do any of the few motion tricks that allow for it in a comic as opposed to a video.
If Sandra and Larissa suddenly switch places, you are confusing the audience.
Crystalgate wrote:
Actully it does matter becuase there different degree of such flatness. There are even more girls who would look underage with their top on who don’t look so underage with their top off.
Here comes the fiery apocalypse of enraged parents…
Leomon wrote:
very very good point
@ Ahchi:
I’m assuming that her parents also have SnapPic.
Roguebfl wrote:
She was she both small enough and flat enough to be mistaken for an underage girl who still young enough to go topless without comment.
Not Exactly.
I’ve SEEN people go Totally Ape over 5 year old Girls topless at the beach.
Not their Own, of course.
European Tourists occasionally show up from places where Tops are optional for Adults and they often see no point in tops for 5 year old kids.
.
Puritanic American’s, on the other hand, can get absolutely Red In The Face when they realize the kid is a GURRRRL.
.
Nope. The woman I was talking about usually got mistaken for a teenage Boy.
.
UUUUUUUUUUUMMM… O_O ID SAY… The main problem with this could have been avoided, if my methodswere followed. I also realized Larisa can defy the laws of physics. She could literally go into her phone and pop out of the recievier’s phone, force them to help, and continue doing this until it becomes fixed. I also think this is why Larisa is so calm about it.
BUT! She refuses to do any of this!
If you think ANY of the things i said could have happened, then reply this with, “True that.”
@ Old Brit:
Um, this site’s system wasn’t built by a company large enough to have 60,000,000 users on one continent alone. Spam blockers do exist, and they can be configured. For this site, sending a pic to everyone is meant to happen. For SnapPic, one user using unofficial programming getting a picture to everyone would definitely set off alarms. Not just posting an image, she was using a system meant to send to specific people.
Roguebfl wrote:
Your earlier comment made me think this is not the case with the woman you described. But I see I should have chosen another word than underage though.
I think this may be the time when we revelation about larisa’s secret that she told to woo will come to light. I have waited so long for this.
Well, Larisa’s not too worried about this, is she?
Over 30 million People IN The U.S is going to jail for having a nude picture of a 15 year old girl on there phone.
FloppyNotFound wrote:
As Lookfar pointed out, Larisa has seen Woo do stuff.
Beyond that, racoons are clever critters and their paws are more dexterous than most animals. Not quite hands like a monkey or chimp, but still. Having a well-deserved reputation for getting into chicken coops, they can open complex latches and closures.
Anyway, there are videos showing particularly clever dogs and cats opening doors. If they can do that, I have zero doubt a racoon could.
newllend(henryvolt) wrote:
Let’s not forget something called “intent.” And the fact that SnapPic photos are transitory and get deleted, making it hard to prove. No prosecutor in the world would try to prosecute millions of people for this accident. And even if they did, there’s not enough room to incarcerate them. Not even close.
Reminds me of a science fiction story I read at least 50 years ago. A bad guy had, somehow, created a device that would replicate him in front of every person in the world for a second; he would then return to normal. He planned to punch everyone in the face.
The narrator, a good guy who knew the bad guy, asked to try it out first. After he returned, the bad guy did it. When he returned, he was all beat up and bloody.
It turns out that the good guy spit in the face of everyone in the world, so everyone was ready to attack the next person who appeared.
@ Ahchi:
They would find out some other way though
Imagine some GOP Teens account sent this
@ Autolykos:
In the US, you won’t get in trouble for involuntarily receiving any sort of contraband as long as you promptly report it. You might have your phone/computer seized as evidence, though.
So, 60M people will have child porn on their phone?
Raccoons are smart. They might get themselves stuck in havaheart traps, or..they might intentionally go in because it seems safer then what’s out there. We’ve had that experience.
Also, they do have opposable thumbs. If they can figure out how to undo a lock, they’ll pull it off.
Larissa doesn’t need to know Woo can talk if it’s safely assumed he’s copied all the humanity around him. My ferret did that where the bathroom was concerned. Unless Landon’s parents are on Snappic, they’ll hear the story second-hand; and her parents could be swayed by an ‘artsy’ excuse.
Oh boy, this is going to get real hairy soon.