The current story arc started with this strip: What Woo needs.
The script for this storyline consisted of eight strips at the start, but I had to cut three of them since they were not good enough.
- Sandra: There you are, at last! Did you have fun with Lily?
- Woo: Yes, it was great!
- Sandra: Tell me more.
- Woo: First we ate a couple of really long, fat earthworms. The best part was when I bit a worm in two and one half of it kept wriggling around in my mouth.
- Woo: After that we made out in Lily’s den. All night long! Lily smelled so good that I licked her everywhere, especially between her hind legs!
- Sandra: Tell me less.
|
does anyone CAN POSSIBLY HATE sandra’s face on panel 2 and 3…specially panel 2..
Bow chicka bow wow! You go dog! Er, racoon….
@ Ivresse:
How old is she? 12? I’d say 3, maybe 2, to 5 years, myself.
Nick/Tyrong wrote:
Nah, I’m going for the safe option. I think she’s not the type to do it that young.
Larisa probably, but not Sandra.
@ m:
liar!!! I’m me
Robot hand will melt into a mumbling metal maul weapon!
« Leox Sthyr wrote on Friday, Aug 26 at 03:52 PM »
*sniffs article* No vampires here. *flys off on a broom stick*
@ m:
But I was FIRST! …*sulks*
Mm… It’s a tough question, whether this is “pushing the line”.
The point of this and the last comics is that they highlight the fact that Woo *is* a raccoon, not a person. And there’s nothing (at least where I live in Australia) considered wrong about children (or young teens, as I should say, as we’re talking about PG 13+) watching animal documentaries that include mating. If Woo and Lily were humans, this comic would be considered completely unsuitable for young teens. So if animal sex is okay, human sex isn’t… I think it’s really up to the individual how “human” animals having sex can be before the line is crossed (from being suitable for young teens, to unsuitable). (I think it’s also up to the individual to decide at what point is watching animal sex perverse… is it all simply down to intention?)
Hey hey, they are TALKING about sex with very politicaly correct words, not SHOWING graphic sex. That would be a 13+ either way, racoon or not. Maybe even less. I mean come on, even sex ed classes “show” and “tell” more than this strip. The s-word is not even used! They “mate” and “make out”. How softer can it be?
Plus, I mean, she knows about it for sure… Like Sandra and Larissa said in a previous strip, makes you wonder if you guys remember how you were when you were 12. Not that pure, gonna tell you that…
Part of me wonders why Sandra seems so revolted
Then I remember she’s supposed to be 11 xD
also, Woo’s face in last panel: PRICELESS
@ gerardo:
Don’t you have a dog or cat?
LOL! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY TO MUCH INFORMATION THERE WOO! LMAO!
Well, you asked…
: I
@ gerardo:
Yes I am sure they do.
Also, you know how thw author has said in the past about how the characters are just young kids… and not in any way in any sort of perverted sort of anything…
I have been noticing that this comic seems to get more and more suggestive and “adult” oriented, especially with the humor, as time progresses.
Is this just because the author has grown alot over the years or are the charaters getting more mature?
Lastly; are we ever going to delve back into Larisa’s medical condition?
Give Sandra a few yrs and she’ll feel much different about this, at least the second part. 😛
Oi
why is that guy agruing with himself, odd
@ m:
ok. I’ll stop posting under your name. *Vanishs in a cloud of smoke.*
Perhaps he should talk to Cloud instead …
Pretty funny but this comic needs less romance and more humor.
Getting too smushy ;/
@ m:
Thank you.
wah!!!
this is where my archive crawl ends, now i have to wait for a new page, it sucks
@ TheDoctor:
Doctor! I think that Lilly got ahold of some Timelord technology! Her tree is bigger on the inside! ;p
that disturbed you guys, man i must be one sick puppy if that doesn’t even fase me.
@ AckAckAck:
well… that actually worked quite well.
LOL SANDRA’S FACE IN THE LAST PANEL
Best face ever
Alright, I don’t think I want to read this comic anymore. I’m sorry, but this isn’t the cute, occasionally rating-bending comic about a girl and her raccoon that I fell in love with.
@ m:
hey, M, deos the name Q mean anything to you? Oh, and do you know of any ways to ward off Demonic horses?
Personally, I think the strip has deserved a rating of PG-13 (or equivalent) for a while now, due to adult themes. This strip does nothing to change that assessment.
Yeah, I think you went a bit too far with the adult humour in the last couple of strips. I’ve been a fan since the series started and I know you are better than this.
TOO MUCH INFO
@ AckAckAck:
Kid Bleach. Soooo adorablllle!
Like people’ve saying: Too far man, too far.
I get it, he’s an animal.
But you could have had her cut him off earlier, and you could have dropped the last comic.
You can IMPLY that he’s screwing her silly, no need to say it outright like this.
@ aerion:
I agree
Cutest TMI I’ve seen in a while.
@ D.T.</
Second
Haha, too much info, indeed. Really though, Sandra, it serve you right for asking the raccoon about his day. Animals have so few reservations about such matters, it’s not even funny. And by THAT I mean it is hilarious. I’ll be honest here – although I’ll be reaching for the brain-bleach after that mental image as well, I kind of envy Woo for being able to talk about it so casually. Seriously, it must make things so much easier for them when it comes time for ‘The Talk’ with their kids, and stuff like that…
I love how clueless Woo is! XD Also, yeah, that WAS rather descriptive.
@ AckAckAck:
That did not help at all…
Why am I the only person here who can handle the idea of raccoon sex?
…..maybe I’m not human- *transforms into giant parasite*
I’ll say this much: A cartoon racoon describing cunnilingus to a teeny-bopper is….. new. Original. Ain’t seen it before.
Never. Ever. Want. To see. Again.
@ Audioworm:
Tell me more, tell more like does he have a car…
To quote Gannon from the legend of Zelda ” it buuuurns” my eyes that is
@ LuigiTime1221:
technically you can be both…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWDhFc6nN1Q
Hahaha! XD I can’t stop laughing! Sandra’s reactions make it all the better! XD
Perhaps “not good enough” is your way of saying you won’t show licking between the hind legs ^^
I just realised my spelling in my previous comment was atrocious.
The sentiment, however, remains.
Still… I’m ashamed of the poor spelling.
Ivresse wrote:
I hope you mean that in the general “Oral Sex” sense, not in the specific “Licking female raccoons hindquarters” sense…